Or maybe the word should be "deja vu". Seems to be a pattern here.
Just some Friday afternoon musings.
It started with AA. Then it was INTC. Then another.... and another..... and another. Each one a blow out. With each blow-out report the fut's moved way up in overnight markets, and the cash market followed. But then what? How many times has this story been told this month? MSFT is just the latest in that long series.
And exactly how many of those stocks are now higher than where they opened on the news release?
Good weekend all, D
http://stockcharts.c...56&are=9935.png
http://stockcharts.c...56&are=3099.png
http://stockcharts.c...56&are=9794.png

An Incredible 11 Distribution Days on SPX
#1
Posted 28 October 2009 - 03:59 PM
#2
Posted 28 October 2009 - 04:19 PM
#3
Posted 28 October 2009 - 04:37 PM
Excellent question CLK. I'll let the SS make the call, and certainly do not rule out a RFTR. But my point in this post is that we are seeing more and more evidence that the Intermediate Term trend is in real trouble. My RFTR theory is based on 2003 fractals. I'll be studying 2003 Q4 volume patterns tonight when I get some time. I'm very curious to see whether the period that proceeded the last part of the IT run into Jan-Feb 2004 was accompanied by distribution patterns on the major averages to the degree we are seeing here. I'd be surprised if it was, but will keep an open mind.....Are you turning IT bearish now ? What happened to the "run for the roses"
after the next dip in NYSI ?
Edited by IYB, 28 October 2009 - 04:38 PM.
#4
Posted 28 October 2009 - 04:39 PM
#5
Posted 28 October 2009 - 04:52 PM
summation index is turning into a freefall
http://stockcharts.c.../McSumNYSE.html
The chart will update sometime around 17:00 EST. Just how I look at things fwiw....
http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$NYMO&p=D&st=2009-02-01&en=2009-12-21&i=p78799162625&a=175707857&are=16.png...the level of NYMO (and other related McO's) is ....anchoring down on price. If you've seen James Cameron's "The Abyss", the NYMO is kinda like that crane that collapsed from up above and fell into the abyss, and then began pulling their sub (price) with it.
![]()
#6
Posted 28 October 2009 - 05:03 PM
summation index is turning into a freefall
http://stockcharts.c.../McSumNYSE.html
Which kind:
Iguazu Falls, widest falls in the planet http://www.bp-reiseb..._wasserfall.htm
or Angel Falls, Tallest falls in the planet. http://z.about.com/d.../innerangel.jpg
#7
Posted 28 October 2009 - 05:46 PM
Excellent question CLK. I'll let the SS make the call, and certainly do not rule out a RFTR. But my point in this post is that we are seeing more and more evidence that the Intermediate Term trend is in real trouble. My RFTR theory is based on 2003 fractals. I'll be studying 2003 Q4 volume patterns tonight when I get some time. I'm very curious to see whether the period that proceeded the last part of the IT run into Jan-Feb 2004 was accompanied by distribution patterns on the major averages to the degree we are seeing here. I'd be surprised if it was, but will keep an open mind.....Are you turning IT bearish now ? What happened to the "run for the roses"
after the next dip in NYSI ?
Yes, internals are very weak. NYMO and NYAD are hitting lows not seen in Q4 03,
though NYSI looks almost identical. If it crashes right here it would be an anomaly
for a bull market. I missed my short entry, so I'm not chasing under these conditions.
#8
Posted 28 October 2009 - 05:50 PM
#9
Posted 28 October 2009 - 07:30 PM
My RFTR theory is based on 2003 fractals.
These fractals look WAY more like 1938 and 1975 than 2003. The context within the overall longer term matches up better as well... just my take.
The strength of Government lies in the people's ignorance, and the Government knows this, and will therefore always oppose true enlightenment. - Leo Tolstoy
#10
Posted 28 October 2009 - 08:04 PM
Well I can {now, having looked at the data} tell you that based on distribution that we can throw out the 2003 fractal and the "run for the roses" expectation. There were exactly four distribution days in the month prior to the start of that last 2003 run. Have been eleven here- nearly three times the distibuative activity. Apples and oranges. This is NOT 2003.....My RFTR theory is based on 2003 fractals.
These fractals look WAY more like 1938 and 1975 than 2003. The context within the overall longer term matches up better as well... just my take.
